Editorial Policy

How Psych Hub content gets made — and held to a standard.

Every course and resource Psych Hub publishes goes through evidence review, clinical accuracy review, cultural responsiveness review, and Clinical Review Team sign-off. This page documents how.

Editorial standards

All Psych Hub content is evidence-based and grounded in current clinical research. Each course or resource is authored or co-authored by a credentialed clinical subject-matter expert. We cite sources where appropriate, distinguish established consensus from emerging practice, and avoid making clinical claims unsupported by the evidence base.

Review process

A working group of additional clinical experts reviews each course for evidence base, clinical accuracy, cultural responsiveness, and accessible reading level. A member of our Clinical Review Team — licensed mental health experts — provides final clinical sign-off before publication, and their name and credentials appear on the work. Courses are re-reviewed periodically as evidence and best practice evolve.

Cultural responsiveness

Content is reviewed for cultural responsiveness and accessible reading level. Where clinical context requires nuance — across age, race, gender identity, sexual orientation, religion, ability, and socioeconomic context — we strive to surface that nuance, not flatten it.

Updates and corrections

When evidence or best practice changes, affected content is revised. When a factual error is identified, we correct it promptly and note the correction. Anyone can flag content for review — see the contact at the bottom of this page.

Conflicts of interest

Subject-matter experts disclose financial relationships, advisory roles, and other affiliations relevant to the content they author or review. Where a conflict exists, we surface it on the content or remove the contributor from the review of that specific item.

AI-generated or AI-assisted content

The AI Therapy Simulator uses AI-generated client personas for clinician practice; no PHI enters the system. Course content is authored by human subject-matter experts; AI tools may assist with drafting, editing, or research, but a human clinical expert is the responsible author of every published course.

Contact for editorial concerns

Flag a factual error, request a content review, or ask about our editorial process: email editorial@psychhub.com.

Have a question about our editorial process?

Talk to our team — or write directly to editorial@psychhub.com.